(Note: This post originally appeared in The AAPG Explorer, Februrary, 2013)
Steve Trammel of IHS stated in the January EXPLORER (“Surprise!
North America Grabbed the Spotlight”), “The Peak Oil guys are pretty quiet now,
thanks to the creativity and innovation of the industry,” as he discussed the
tight oil additions to oil production in the United States and Canada.
I am on the board of directors of the Association for the Study of
Peak Oil (ASPO USA), and I can assure you that we are not quiet nor do these
additions change our concern about the growing cost of oil and its effect on
our economy.
In the past month alone, we held a major conference in Austin
co-sponsored by the University of Texas, a great advocate for the oil and gas
business (Texas leads the United States in both oil and gas production). Right
after the conference in Austin, a group of our members presented a panel
discussion at the fall American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco.
In the same month, we were invited to spend two hours with Adam
Sieminski, the new Administrator of the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA),
and all of his top line staff. On the same day, we met with the new chairman of
the Senate Natural Resources Committee, and with a former senior senator who is
now among the leading energy lobbyists in Washington.
Some people take us very seriously because they understand that
“peak oil” does not mean we are running out of oil. It means that we have run
out of the cheap oil on which the global economy is predicated. That is serious
business.
We also applaud the creativity and innovation of the industry that
has increased U.S. production over the past few years. It is, however, very
expensive oil. Tight oil requires at least $80 per barrel for operators to
break even because of the cost of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing,
not to mention the unprecedented leasing costs that the shale revolution has
brought to our industry.
The high price of oil is among the key underlying reasons that the
United States and most of the developed world cannot get out this recession.
Gross domestic product (GDP) and oil consumption correlate because the economy
runs on energy, and oil and its refined products are the largest component of
primary energy consumption.
Because of the high price of oil, consumption in the United States
has fallen 1.5 percent per year since 2005, and GDP has followed suit. Pre-2005
normal growth for the U.S. economy was 1.8 percent per year. With an annual 1.5
percent decline built in, it is not hard to see the problem with resuming
growth.*
The IHS tight oil study Trammel quotes is confusing because it
combines Canada and the United States. Canada has been energy self-sufficient
for decades and is the leading oil exporter to the United States – any
production additions from Canada are still imported oil for the United States.
The EIA estimates that U.S. crude oil production will increase to
nearly eight million barrels per day by 2020 and then decline. Present
consumption is almost 15.5 million barrels per day. If EIA is correct, the
United States will still have to import about seven million barrels per day
allowing for demand decline, and that does not look like energy independence to
me.
Most of the exuberant reports about energy self-sufficiency from
domestic production lump crude oil, natural gas liquids, refinery processing
gain and biofuels as “liquids.” That is fine, but we must bear in mind that
what we import is crude oil and today, we cannot use other liquids for
transport – the main use of crude oil – without massive equipment and
infrastructure changes that will cost trillions of dollars and take decades.
These same optimistic reports almost never consider cost, price or
profit margins.
The new production we are finding from tight oil is both important
and exciting, and it will help make the United States less dependent on foreign
crude oil. It will not, however, make us energy independent.
Peak Oil guys like me are hoping that at least people in the oil
and gas business will realize that we have a problem that is not going away.
(*All data in this section from Douglas-Westwood.)
(Editor’s note: Berman, an AAPG member, is with Labyrinth
Consulting Services in Sugar Land, Texas.)
2 comments:
ev taşıma
Peak oil was most popular hydraulic liquid in old days but now improved oils have replaced it and now the new oils have a greater tensile strength and improved efficiency.
Thanks
Henry Jordan
Hydraulic Seal Kits
Post a Comment