She wrote, "Only trouble with the claim is the main person Goodell uses to substantiate this claim has now written that he was misquoted, that the reporter had a political agenda and that there is no truth to the reporter's claim."
She, apparently, has the same problem mis-quoting me as Goodell. I wrote that I was mis-quoted but never said that the author had a political agenda or that there was no truth to the reporter's claim.
The statements incorrectly attributed to me in Rolling Stone are "According to Arthur Berman, a respected energy consultant in Texas who has spent years studying the industry, Chesapeake and its lesser competitors resemble a Ponzi scheme, overhyping the promise of shale gas in an effort to recoup their huge investments in leases and drilling. When the wells don't pay off, the firms wind up scrambling to mask their financial troubles with convoluted off-book accounting methods."
What I wrote was "That may be what Goodell thinks but that is not what I said, think or imply."
The two quoted statements by me that follow in the same paragraph were accurately represented by Goodell.